Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Zer: Journal of Communication Studies ; 28(54):73-100, 2023.
Article in Spanish | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-20243815

ABSTRACT

This study examines communication and information regarding mental health in four public universities in four countries and compares perceptions about the prevalence and importance of mental health problems and about the visibility of university health services. Therefore, the purpose is to better understand the space granted by the university to this issue, and the role that internal university communication could play in facilitating the renewal of social bonds. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] Este estudio1 analiza la comunicación y la información respecto de la salud mental en cuatro universidades públicas pertenecientes a cuatro países y compara las percepciones acerca de la prevalencia y la importancia de los problemas de salud mental y sobre la visibilidad de los servicios de salud universitarios. Por consiguiente, el propósito es entender mejor el espacio otorgado por la universidad a esta problemática en sus diferentes territorios y el rol que puede tener la comunicación interna universitaria en esta temática. Finalmente se presenta la comunicación como agente facilitador de la renovación del lazo social pudiendo influenciar en las estrategias de comunicación universitarias. (Spanish) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Zer: Journal of Communication Studies / Revista de Estudios de Comunicacion / Komunikazio Ikasketen Aldizkaria is the property of Universidad del Pais Vasco and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

2.
Acta Paul. Enferm. (Online) ; 35: eAPE02206, 2022. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-20234531

ABSTRACT

Resumo Objetivo Analisar os fatores associados à restrição do acompanhamento de lactentes que nasceram prematuros e/ou baixo peso durante a pandemia da COVID-19 e a percepção de mães e profissionais de saúde quanto a essa realidade. Métodos Pesquisa de método misto com delineamento paralelo convergente, realizada com 14 mães de lactentes que nasceram prematuros e/ou baixo peso acompanhados no ambulatório de follow-up de uma maternidade em um município da Paraíba, e quatro profissionais de saúde desse serviço. A coleta de dados foi realizada no período de junho a julho de 2020, concomitantemente, em fonte de dados secundários, constituída de todos os 140 prontuários dos respectivos lactentes para abordagem quantitativa, por meio de entrevista semiestruturada, para abordagem qualitativa. A análise quantitativa ocorreu por estatística descritiva e inferencial, e a qualitativa, conforme análise temática indutiva. Resultados Houve associação significativa entre a idade dos lactentes e a restrição do seu acompanhamento no follow-up durante a pandemia, com priorização do atendimento presencial dos menores de seis meses, contatos pontuais com os familiares, via ligação telefônica ou aplicativo digital, e lacunas na atualização do calendário vacinal dos que tiveram o acompanhamento interrompido. Isso gerou insatisfação das mães e receio de prejuízos ao desenvolvimento dos lactentes. Também não houve continuidade do cuidado desses na unidade básica de saúde. Conclusão Houveram restrições no acompanhamento dos lactentes nascidos prematuros no serviço de follow-up durante a pandemia, gerando insatisfação materna e receio de prejuízos ao desenvolvimento de seus filhos.


Resumen Objetivo Analizar los factores asociados a la restricción del seguimiento de lactantes que nacieron prematuros o de bajo peso durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y la percepción de madres y profesionales de la salud respecto a esta realidad. Métodos Estudio de método mixto con diseño paralelo convergente, realizado con 14 madres de lactantes que nacieron prematuros o de bajo peso atendidos en consultorios externos de follow-up de una maternidad en un municipio del estado de Paraíba, y cuatro profesionales de la salud de este servicio. La recopilación de datos fue realizada en el período de junio a julio de 2020, simultáneamente en fuente de datos secundarios, compuesta por las 140 historias clínicas de los respectivos lactantes para el enfoque cuantitativo, por medio de entrevista semiestructurada, para el enfoque cualitativo. El análisis cuantitativo se llevó a cabo por estadística descriptiva e inferencial, y el cualitativo mediante análisis temático inductivo. Resultados Hubo relación significativa entre la edad de los lactantes y la restricción de su seguimiento en el follow-up durante la pandemia, con priorización de atención presencial a los menores de seis meses, contactos puntuales con los familiares, vía llamada telefónica o aplicación digital, y vacíos en la actualización del calendario de vacunación de los que tuvieron el seguimiento interrumpido. Esto generó insatisfacción de las madres y temor de perjudicar el desarrollo de los lactantes. Tampoco hubo continuidad del cuidado de estos en la unidad básica de salud. Conclusión Hubo restricciones en el seguimiento de los lactantes nacidos prematuros en el servicio de follow-up durante la pandemia, lo que generó insatisfacción materna y temor de perjudicar el desarrollo de sus hijos.


Abstract Objective To analyze the factors associated with restricting the follow-up of infants who were born premature and/or low birth weight during the COVID-19 pandemic and mothers' and health professionals' perception regarding this reality. Methods This is mixed methods research with a parallel convergent design, carried out with 14 mothers of infants who were born premature and/or low birth weight, followed up at a follow-up outpatient clinic of a maternity hospital in a municipality in Paraíba, and four health professionals from this service. Data collection was carried out from June to July 2020, concomitantly, in a secondary data source, consisting of all 140 medical records of the respective infants for a quantitative approach, through a semi-structured interview, for a qualitative approach. Quantitative analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative analysis, according to inductive thematic analysis. Results There was a significant association between infant age and the restriction of their follow-up during the pandemic, with prioritization of one-to-one care for children under six months of age, occasional contacts with family members, via phone call or digital application, and gaps in updating the vaccination schedule of those whose follow-up was interrupted. This generated dissatisfaction on the part of mothers and fear of harm to the development of infants. There was also no continuity of care for these in the Basic Health Unit. Conclusion There were restrictions on follow-up of premature infants in the follow-up service during the pandemic, generating maternal dissatisfaction and fear of damage to the development of their children.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Breast Feeding , Infant, Premature , Maternal-Child Health Services , COVID-19 , Mothers , Child Health Services , Medical Records , Interviews as Topic , Evaluation Studies as Topic
3.
Rev. peru. ginecol. obstet. (En línea) ; 67(3): 00009, jul.-sep 2021.
Article in Spanish | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-2317926

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Han trascurrido dieciocho meses desde que se declaró como pandemia la infección COVID-19 ocasionada por el SARS-CoV-2. No existe aún tratamiento contra el virus, salvo el sintomático y recuperativo. El rápido reconocimiento del nuevo coronavirus permitió la elaboración de vacunas que están siendo usadas de emergencia y han permitido disminuir los casos graves, hospitalizaciones, uso de unidades de cuidados intensivos, ventilación mecánica y muertes. Pero aún quedan incógnitas sobre las modificaciones genéticas y variantes que el virus utiliza para una mejor invasión y adaptación a las defensas del ser humano, así como sobre sus consecuencias inmediatas y a largo plazo en el hombre, la mujer y su niño. Parece distante alcanzar la inmunización de rebaño, porque desconocemos la inmunidad proporcionada por la infección y por las vacunas, así como su duración, y por la importante parte de la población que no desea vacunarse. Además, existe insuficiente capacidad de oferta de vacunas, accesibilidad limitada a los servicios de salud, situación económica desfavorable, incremento de la pobreza y sus consecuencias, disminución temporal de la expectativa de vida y otras complicaciones secundarias a la infección por el virus. La presente revisión es un recuento breve de lo avanzado recientemente en el conocimiento y manejo del COVID-19, en momentos en que el Perú celebra el Bicentenario de la Independencia del país del dominio español, un 28 de julio de 1821, y que encuentra a los peruanos en medio de una pandemia agresiva, elusiva y mortal, y con aspectos humanos, poblacionales, económicos y políticos a resolver.


ABSTRACT Eighteen months have passed since the COVID-19 infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 was declared a pandemic. There is still no treatment for the virus other than symptomatic and recuperative. The rapid recognition of the novel coronavirus allowed the development of vaccines that are being used on an emergency basis and have led to a decrease in severe cases, hospitalizations, use of intensive care units, mechanical ventilation and deaths. But there are still unknowns about the genetic modifications and variants that the virus uses for better invasion and adaptation to human defenses, as well as about its immediate and long-term consequences in men, women and their children. Herd immunization seems distant to achieve, because we do not know the immunity provided by the infection and vaccines, as well as its duration, and because a large part of the population that does not want to be vaccinated. In addition, there is insufficient vaccine supply capacity, limited accessibility to health services, unfavorable economic situation, increased poverty and its consequences, temporary decrease in life expectancy and other complications secondary to infection by the virus. The present review is a brief account of recent advances in the knowledge and management of COVID-19, at a time when Peru is celebrating the Bicentennial of the country's Independence from Spanish rule, on July 28, 1821, and when Peruvians find themselves in the midst of an aggressive, elusive and deadly pandemic, with human, population, economic and political issues to be resolved.

4.
Rev. med. Urug ; 38(4): e38406, dic. 2022.
Article in Spanish | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-2310601

ABSTRACT

Introducción: el cáncer de cuello uterino (CCU) causa una significativa pérdida de años por discapacidad y muerte prematura en el mundo. Se relaciona fuertemente, por su etiología, a las inequidades socioeconómicas. Alcanzar una cobertura del 80% del tamizaje poblacional a través de la colpocitología oncológica constituye una de las principales estrategias para disminuir la morbimortalidad por este cáncer. Objetivos: describir la cobertura de tamizaje en CCU de las mujeres de 21 a 64 años, usuarias del Sistema Nacional Integrado de Salud (SNIS) de Uruguay en el año 2018 y explorar su comportamiento según edad, lugar de residencia, características socioeconómicas y culturales del territorio. Métodos: estudio descriptivo, en base a fuentes de datos secundarios, con una muestra que alcanzó el 95% del universo. La técnica de tamizaje considerada fue la colpocitología oncológica de (PAP) con vigencia de hasta 3 años al 30/9/2018. Resultados: la cobertura de tamizaje en CCU en 2018 fue del 57%, siendo menor en las primeras y últimas edades consideradas, variando por zona geográfica, encontrándose menor porcentaje de PAP vigente en las mujeres residentes en departamentos con menores índices de desarrollo humano y con mayor porcentaje de hogares por debajo de la línea de pobreza. Conclusiones: la cobertura de tamizaje en CCU en Uruguay debe aumentar para disminuir la morbimortalidad por este cáncer. Se requiere implementar acciones para reducir la heterogeneidad entre edades y departamentos de residencia. Esta estimación constituye una línea de base que permite comparar la situación país pospandemia COVID-19 replicando la misma metodología.


Summary: Introduction: cervical cancer causes a significant loss of years due to disabilities and early deaths around the world. Due to its etiology, it is closely linked to socio- economic inequalities. Cervical cancer screening coverage of 80 % of the population through and pap smear constitutes one of the main strategies to reduce morbimortality of this kind of cancer. Objectives: to describe cervical cancer screening coverage in women between 21 and 64 years old, users of the National Integrated Health System (SNIS) in Uruguay in 2018 and explore their behavior according to age, place of residence, socio-economic and territorial cultural characteristics. Method: descriptive study, based on secondary data sources of a sample representing 95% of the universe. The screening technique considered in the study was a pap smear, valid for up to three years on September 30, 2019. Results: cervical cancer screening coverage in 2018 was 57%, lower in the first and last ages considered and it varied depending on the geographical area. A lower percentage of valid smear tests was found in women who were residents of provinces with lower human development index and a higher percentage of homes below the poverty line. Conclusions: cervical cancer screening coverage in Uruugay needs to increase in order to reduce morbimortality. The implementation of actions aimed at reducing differences between ages and places of residence is required. This estimation may be taken as a baseline that allows for a comparison with the post-COVID 19 pandemic situation, by replicating the same method.


Introdução: o câncer do colo do útero (CCU), causa uma perda significativa de anos por incapacidade e morte prematura no mundo estando fortemente relacionada, por sua etiologia, às iniquidades socioeconômicas. Uma das principais estratégias para reduzir a morbimortalidade por esse câncer é alcançar 80% de cobertura de rastreamento populacional por meio da colpocitologia oncológica. Objetivos: descrever a cobertura do rastreamento do CCU em mulheres de 21 a 64 anos, usuárias do Sistema Nacional Integrado de Saúde (SNIS) do Uruguai em 2018 e analisar seu comportamento de acordo com idade, local de residência, características socioeconômicas e culturais do território. Métodos: estudo descritivo, baseado em fontes de dados secundárias de uma amostra que atingiu 95% do universo. A técnica de rastreamento considerada foi a colpocitologia oncológica (PAP) válida por até 3 anos a partir de 30/09/2018. Resultados: a cobertura de rastreamento no CCU em 2018 foi de 57%, sendo menor nas primeiras e últimas idades consideradas, variando por área geográfica, encontrando menor percentual de PAP atual em mulheres residentes em departamentos com menores índices de desenvolvimento humano e com maior percentual de famílias abaixo da linha de pobreza. Conclusões: deve-se aumentar a cobertura de rastreamento no CCU no Uruguai para reduzir a morbimortalidade por esse câncer. É necessário implementar ações para reduzir a heterogeneidade entre idades e departamentos de residência. Essa estimativa constitui uma linha de base que permite comparar a situação do país pós-pandemia por COVID-19, replicando a mesma metodologia.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Mass Screening , Early Detection of Cancer , Uruguay , National Health Systems
5.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 52(1): 58-64, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2291464

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVE: To characterise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric hospitalisations in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. METHODS: Descriptive study. 85 semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers involved with psychiatric hospitalisations in general hospitals (GHs) and specialised psychiatric hospitals (SHs) from 18 LAC countries. The interviews were done between 8 May and 30 June 2020. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: An initial decrease in the demand for hospitalisation is reported, attributed to the population's fear of approaching health services as well as restrictions on mobility. Stricter criteria for hospitalisation were reported with a double focus on the acute within the acute. The length of hospitalisations were mixed, with both increases and decreases in GHs and SHs. The therapeutic offer was drastically reduced, and interaction between hospitalised people and their support networks was restricted. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 context, hospitalisation seems to be not the last but the only alternative for psychiatric treatment. The decrease in the number of beds in SHs could be a positive aspect for the reform of psychiatric care, but it is questioned since this reduction also occurs in GHs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Latin America , Pandemics , Inpatients , Caribbean Region
6.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 2021 Jun 17.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250126

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVE: To characterise the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric hospitalisations in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. METHODS: Descriptive study. 85 semi-structured interviews were conducted with health workers involved with psychiatric hospitalisations in general hospitals (GHs) and specialised psychiatric hospitals (SHs) from 18 LAC countries. The interviews were done between 8 May and 30 June 2020. The data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: An initial decrease in the demand for hospitalisation is reported, attributed to the population's fear of approaching health services as well as restrictions on mobility. Stricter criteria for hospitalisation were reported with a double focus on the acute within the acute. The length of hospitalisations were mixed, with both increases and decreases in GHs and SHs. The therapeutic offer was drastically reduced, and interaction between hospitalised people and their support networks was restricted. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 context, hospitalisation seems to be not the last but the only alternative for psychiatric treatment. The decrease in the number of beds in SHs could be a positive aspect for the reform of psychiatric care, but it is questioned since this reduction also occurs in GHs.

7.
Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem ; 30, 2022.
Article in Spanish | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2054587

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: describir los preparativos tecnoasistenciales que se desarrollaron en el ámbito de la gestión del trabajo en la red de atención de la pandemia de COVID-19, desde la perspectiva de los gestores. Método: investigación cualitativa, del tipo caso único incorporado, con 23 gestores de una Red de Atención de Salud. Análisis aplicado en dos ciclos de codificación temática, con ayuda del software ATLAS.ti. Resultados: los preparativos fueron analizados en categorías relacionadas con: la atención de la salud;la administración;la incorporación de tecnologías;la implementación de un hospital de campaña;y el análisis retrospectivo de las experiencias en general. Se destacaron la implementación del flujo de atención, los boletines virtuales de salud, el telemonitoreo, los chatbots, el uso de aplicaciones, la implementación de hospitales de campaña y emergencias básicas en el ámbito de las Unidades Básicas de Salud. Se identificaron la hiperjudicialización en el sistema;las debilidades en la gestión de la información, la intersectorialidad y conducción técnico-política a nivel nacional;el protagonismo de los enfermeros en cargos de gestión y para hacer frente a la pandemia. Conclusión: a pesar de la falta de preparación de los servicios de salud para enfrentar la pandemia, la resiliencia de los actores promovió el dinamismo y los preparativos tecnoasistenciales en el ámbito de la gestión y de la atención humanizada. El estudio tiene una contribución potencial para la calificación de las prácticas de gestión y el desarrollo de políticas públicas.

8.
Rev. epidemiol. controle infecç ; 12(2): 61-68, abr.-jun. 2022. ilus
Article in English | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-1998090

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in different settings is essential to guide the establishment of appropriate TB control strategies. This study aimed to assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic in laboratory diagnosis of TB in patients tested and diagnosed for TB. Methods: a data survey was carried out in the database of laboratories that perform TB diagnosis for the public health system in Rio Grande city (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). Results: there was a decrease of 1,368 to 735 (reduction of 46.3%) in the number of patients tested for TB in public diagnostic services in 2019 and 2020, respectively, and a decrease of 197 to 119 (reduction of 39.6%) in the number of new TB cases diagnosed. In contrast, the positivity rate was 14.4% in 2019 and 16.2% in 2020. Moreover, it was observed that the laboratory that performs the diagnostic service for Primary Health Care was the most affected, when compared to Tertiary Health Care. Conclusion: as a consequence of measures to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, there was a reduction in TB testing and in the detection of new cases, especially in Primary Health Care, where patients with less need for hospitalization are received.(AU)


Justificativa e objetivos: compreender o impacto da pandemia COVID-19 no diagnóstico da tuberculose (TB) em diferentes locais é essencial para orientar o estabelecimento de estratégias adequadas de controle da TB. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência da pandemia de COVID-19 no diagnóstico laboratorial de TB, em pacientes testados e diagnosticados com TB. Métodos: foi realizado um levantamento de dados no banco de dados de laboratórios que realizam diagnóstico de TB para o sistema público de saúde na cidade de Rio Grande (Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil). Resultados: houve redução de 1.368 para 735 (redução de 46,3%) no número de pacientes testados para TB nos serviços públicos de diagnóstico em 2019 e 2020, respectivamente, e redução de 197 para 119 (redução de 39,6%) no número de novos casos de TB diagnosticados. Em contrapartida, a taxa de positividade foi de 14,4% em 2019 e 16,2% em 2020. Além disso, observou-se que o laboratório que realiza o serviço de diagnóstico para a Atenção Primária à Saúde foi o mais afetado, quando comparado com a Atenção Terciária à Saúde. Conclusão: como consequência das medidas de controle da disseminação do SARS-CoV-2, houve redução na testagem de TB e na detecção de novos casos, principalmente na atenção primária à saúde, onde são recebidos pacientes com menor necessidade de internação.(AU)


Justificación y objetivos: comprender el impacto de la pandemia Covid-19 en el diagnóstico de tuberculosis (TB) en diferentes lugares es fundamental para orientar el establecimiento de estrategias adecuadas de control de la TB. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la influencia de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el diagnóstico de laboratorio de TB, en términos de pacientes examinados y diagnosticados de TB. Métodos: los datos fueron recolectados de la base de datos de los laboratorios que realizan el diagnóstico de TB para el sistema público de salud en la ciudad de Rio Grande (Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil). Resultados: hubo una reducción de 1.368 a 735 (reducción del 46,3%) en el número de pacientes sometidos a pruebas de TB en los servicios públicos de diagnóstico en 2019 y 2020, respectivamente, y una reducción de 197 a 119 (reducción del 39,6%) en el número de nuevos casos de TB diagnosticados. Por otro lado, la tasa de positividad fue de 14,4% en 2019 y 16,2% en 2020. Además, se observó que el laboratorio que realiza el servicio de diagnóstico para la Atención Primaria de Salud fue el más afectado, en comparación con la Atención Terciaria de Salud. Conclusiones: como consecuencia de las medidas para el control de la propagación del SARS-CoV-2, hubo una reducción en las pruebas de TB y en la detección de nuevos casos, especialmente en la Atención Primaria de Salud, donde se encuentran los pacientes con menor necesidad de hospitalización.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , COVID-19 , Pandemics , Health Services
9.
Gac Sanit ; 36 Suppl 1: S36-S43, 2022.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1920887

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated public health emergency have affected patients and health services in non-COVID-19 pathologies. Several studies have shown its dissociation from health services, with a decrease in emergency department visits, in hospital admissions for non-COVID-19 pathologies, as well as in the reported weekly incidence of acute illnesses and new diagnoses in primary care. In parallel, the pandemic has had direct and indirect effects on people with chronic diseases; the difficulties in accessing health services, the interruption of care, the saturation of the system itself and its reorientation towards non-face-to-face formats has reduced the capacity to prevent or control chronic diseases. All this has also had an impact on the different areas of people's lives, creating new social and economic difficulties, or aggravating those that existed before the pandemic. All these circumstances have changed with each epidemic wave. We present a review of the most relevant studies that have been analyzing this problem and incorporate as a case study the results of a retrospective observational study carried out in Primary Care in the Madrid Health Service, which provides health coverage to a population of more than 6 million people, and whose objective was to analyze the loss of new diagnoses in the most prevalent pathologies such as common mental health problems, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and breast and colon tumors, in the first and second waves. Annual incidence rates with their confidence interval were calculated for each pathology and the monthly frequency of new codes recorded between 1/01/2020 and 12/31/2020 was compared with the monthly mean of observed counts for the same months between 2016 and 2019. The annual incidence rate for all processes studied decreased in 2020 except for anxiety disorders. Regarding the recovery of lost diagnoses, heart failure is the only diagnosis showing an above-average recovery after the first wave. To return to pre-pandemic levels of diagnosis and follow-up of non-COVID-19 pathology, the healthcare system must reorganize and contemplate specific actions for the groups at highest risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Missed Diagnosis , Observational Studies as Topic , Pandemics
10.
Rev. epidemiol. controle infecç ; 12(1): 7-12, jan.-mar. 2022. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-1897232

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Leprosy is an infectious disease in which early diagnosis is a decisive factor to prevent disability and disabilities. This study sought to analyze the panorama of leprosy between 2016 and 2021 in the state of Rio Grande do Sul and unveil the importance of medical education in the context of Neglected Tropical Diseases during the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: Cross-sectional study using the State Center database of Health Surveillance of Rio Grande do Sul. In the data collection, were included leprosy data of individuals residents in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), in the 2016 period 2021. The variables analyzed were confirmed leprosy cases, notified cases, the number of cases in terms of operational classifications of leprosy, the therapeutic scheme, and the number of cases according to the degrees of physical disability. Results: Over this period, 725 cases were confirmed as leprosy, 70% in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018. Of the total number of cases, 88% were Multibacillary form of the disease, 50% had some degree of disability at diagnosis time and 80% underwent the standard treatment regimen. Conclusion: There is a delay in leprosy diagnosis, and there is underdiagnosis of the disease in the state of Rio Grande do Sul: which highlights the need to reaffirm educational practices on mycobacteriosis.(AU)


Justificativa e objetivos: A hanseníase é uma doença infectocontagiosa na qual o diagnóstico precoce é fator decisivo para prevenir incapacidade e deficiências. O presente estudo buscou analisar o panorama da hanseníase entre os anos de 2016 e 2021 no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, desvelando a importância da educação médica no contexto das Doenças Tropicais Negligenciadas durante a pandemia da Sars-CoV-2. Métodos: Estudo transversal por meio da base de dados do Centro Estadual de Vigilância em Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul. Na coleta de dados, foram incluídos os dados de hanseníase em indivíduos residentes do estado do Rio Grande do Sul (RS), no período de 2016 a 2021. As variáveis analisadas foram os casos confirmados de hanseníase, os casos notificados, o número de casos quanto às classificações operacionais de hanseníase, o esquema terapêutico e o número de casos de acordo com os graus de incapacidade física. Resultados: No período analisado, foram confirmados 725 casos de hanseníase, sendo 70% nos anos de 2016, 2017 e 2018. Do número total de casos, 88% eram a forma multibacilar da doença, 50% apresentaram algum grau de incapacidade física no momento do diagnóstico e 80% realizaram o esquema terapêutico padrão. Conclusão: Existe atraso no diagnóstico de hanseníase e há subdiagnóstico da doença no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, o que evidencia a necessidade de reafirmação das práticas educacionais sobre a micobacteriose.(AU)


Justificación y objetivos: La lepra es una enfermedad infecciosa en la que el diagnóstico precoz es un factor decisivo para prevenir la incapacidad y las discapacidades. Este estudio buscó analizar el panorama de la lepra entre 2016 y 2021 en el estado de Rio Grande do Sul y develar la importancia de la educación médica en el contexto de las Enfermedades Tropicales Desatendidas durante la pandemia Sars-CoV-2. Métodos: Estudio transversal con datos del Centro Estatal de Vigilancia en Salud de Rio Grande do Sul. La recolección de datos incluyó datos sobre lepra en individuos residentes en el estado de Rio Grande do Sul (RS), de 2016 a 2021. Las variables analizadas fueron casos confirmados de lepra, casos notificados, el número de casos en términos de clasificaciones operativas de lepra, el esquema terapéutico y el número de casos según los grados de discapacidad física. Resultados: En el período analizado se confirmaron 725 casos de lepra, 70% en los años 2016, 2017 y 2018. Del total de casos, 88% fueron la forma multibacilar de la enfermedad, 50% tenían algún grado de discapacidad física en el momento del diagnóstico y el 80% realizó el régimen terapéutico padrón. Conclusiones: Hay un retraso en el diagnóstico de la lepra y hay un infradiagnóstico de la enfermedad en el estado de Rio Grande do Sul: lo que pone de relieve la necesidad de reafirmar las prácticas educativas sobre micobacteriosis.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Education, Medical , Leprosy , Diagnostic Errors , Neglected Diseases , COVID-19 , Health Services Research
11.
Aten Primaria ; 54(1): 102156, 2022 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1693940

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To know the characteristics of the initial care and telephone follow-up of patients with suspected COVID-19 in the first wave of the pandemic. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective (audit of medical records). LOCATION: Urban Primary Care Center of Andalusia (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Probable cases of SARS-CoV-2 (from 20/03/15 to 20/06/15). PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS: Initial medical assessment (place and modality) and telephone follow-up (number of calls and duration). Sociodemographic variables (including family structure). Clinical course (symptoms, vulnerability, tests, hospital admission and outcome). RESULTS: Three hundred one patients (51.5±17.8 years; 23% vulnerable people; 17% non-nuclear family structure). First assessment in Primary Care by phone (59.8%) and face-to-face (25.2%). At the hospital emergency department (11%), patients were more frequently from non-nuclear families (P<.05 χ2) and more tests were carried out (P<.05 χ2) despite having similar symptoms. Vulnerable elderly patients needed home health care (P<.01 ANOVA). 8.2±4.4 follow-up phone calls were made per patient, for 17.1±10.3 days. It increases after ≥2 face-to-face consultations (OR 4.8), the presence of alarm symptoms (OR 2.3) and age ≥45 years (OR 2.0). Few confirmatory tests were performed (19.3% antigenic, 13% serology). The 15.3% hospital admissions (all assessed previously in Primary Care), with 6.3% severe cases and 2.3% death. CONCLUSION: Population chose to be attended in Primary Care during the pandemic first wave, above all by phone. Telephone follow-up was well accepted and useful to select patients with serious complications. Initial medical assessment in the hospital emergency department was related to a lack of social support but not with greater clinical severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
12.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) ; 69(1): 25-33, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1620994

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment during Covid-19 pandemic is controversial. Currently, most clinical guidelines advise to defer surgical patients during the Covid-19 pandemic, although the supporting data is sparse. We assumed that a Covid-19-free hospital, on the back of strong isolation measures and targeted screening, could reduce complications and enable us to continue treating high-risk patients. METHODS: Prospective study with retrospective analysis of 355 patients who had undergone nondeferrable oncological surgery between March 16th, 2020, and April 14th, 2020, at our institution. The aim of the study was to assess the hospital restructuring and surgical protocols to be able to safely handle non-deferrable surgeries during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. We implemented structural changes and an updated surgical-anesthetic protocol in order to isolate Covid-19 patients from other surgical patients. Comprehensive targeted screening for Covid-19 patients was made. PCR tests were requested for suspected Covid-19 patients. We analyzed mortality and complications related to both surgery and Covid-19 during hospital admission and also 15 and 30 days after surgery. We compared it with a sample of similar patients in the pre-pandemic period. RESULTS: Of the 355 patients enrolled in our study, 21 were removed due to Covid-19 infection, leaving a total of 334 patients in our final analysis. Post-operative complications were found in 37 patients (11.07%). Two patients died after surgery (0.6%). At the end of the study, Covid-19-related adverse outcomes were detected in six patients (1.79%). When comparing the complications of our original sample with the complications that occurred in the pre-covid era, we found no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the surgical treatment of oncologic patients during the Covid-19 pandemic is safe, as long as the hospital performs surgeries under strict isolation measures and a robust screening method. It is necessary to select Covid-19 free hospitals for this matter in this and future pandemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
13.
Nutr Hosp ; 39(1): 93-100, 2022 Feb 09.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1513319

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: the identification of nutritional risk at hospital admission is important to establish timely interventions in the COVID-19 patient care cycle, due to a high risk of it being associated with complications. Objective: to determine the association between the level of nutritional risk upon admission and in-hospital mortality at 28 days in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 treated between March and October 2020 in two hospital institutions in Colombia. Methods: a retrospective, observational study. Hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included and assessed by the Nutrition Service using the nutritional risk identification in emergencies scale, adapted from the NRS 2002 scale. In-hospital mortality at 28 days was analyzed as the primary endpoint, and hospital stay, admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and requirement for mechanical ventilation as secondary endpoints. Results: a total of 1230 patients were included, with a mean age of 65.43 ± 15.90 years, mainly men (57.1 %, n = 702). A high nutritional risk (≥ 2 points) was identified in 74.3 % (n = 914). Patients with a high nutritional risk had a greater probability of in-hospital death at 28 days (HRadj: 1.64; 95 % CI: 1.11-2.44), and a greater risk of requiring mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.78; 95 % CI: 1.11-2.86) or ICU admission (OR = 1.478; 95 % CI: 1.05-2.09), as well as hospital stay longer than 7 days (OR = 1.91; 95 % CI: 1.47-2.48). Conclusions: patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 at high nutritional risk had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality at 28 days and a higher probability of requiring mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and prolonged hospital stay.


INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la identificación del riesgo nutricional al ingreso hospitalario es importante para establecer intervenciones oportunas en el ciclo de atención del paciente con COVID-19, debido al alto riesgo de asociarse a complicaciones. Objetivo: determinar la asociación entre el nivel de riesgo nutricional al ingreso y la mortalidad intrahospitalaria a 28 días en pacientes con diagnóstico de COVID-19 atendidos entre marzo y octubre de 2020 en una red de dos instituciones hospitalarias de Colombia. Metodología: estudio observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de COVID-19 y valorados por el Servicio de Nutrición con la escala de identificación de riesgo nutricional en emergencias, adaptada de la escala NRS 2002. Se analizó como resultado principal la mortalidad intrahospitalaria a 28 días y como secundarios, la estancia hospitalaria, el ingreso a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) y el requerimiento de ventilación mecánica. Resultados: se incluyeron 1230 pacientes, con edad promedio de 65,43 ± 15,90 años, principalmente hombres (57,1 %, n = 702). Se identificó un alto riesgo nutricional (≥ 2 puntos) en el 74,3 % (n = 914). Se evidenció que los pacientes con alto riesgo nutricional tenían una mayor probabilidad de muerte intrahospitalaria a 28 días (HR: 1,64; IC 95 %: 1,11-2,44) y un mayor riesgo de requerir ventilación mecánica (OR = 1,78; IC 95 %: 1,11-2,86), de ingreso en la UCI (OR = 1,478; IC 95 %: 1,05-2,09) y de estancia hospitalaria superior a 7 días (OR = 1,91; IC 95 %: 1,47-2,48). Conclusiones: los pacientes con diagnóstico de COVID-19 y riesgo nutricional alto presentaron una mortalidad intrahospitalaria a 28 días significativamente mayor y una mayor probabilidad de requerir ventilación mecánica y atención en la UCI, así como estancias hospitalarias prolongadas.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 50(3): 199-213, 2021.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1347802

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to compare the emotional effects of COVID-19 among three different groups, namely: health personnel, medical students, and a sample of the general population. METHODS: 375 participants were recruited for this study, of which 125 were medical students (preclinical studies, 59; clinical studies, 66), 125 were health personnel (COVID-19 frontline personnel, 59; personnel not related with COVID-19, 66), and 125 belonged to the general population. The PHQ-9, GAD-7, and CPDI scales were used to assess the emotional impact. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to measure differences between groups, considering potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Regarding CPDI values, all other groups showed reduced values compared to COVID-19 frontline personnel. However, the general population, preclinical and clinical medical students showed increased PHQ-9 values compared to COVID-19 frontline personnel. Finally, confounding factors, gender and age correlated negatively with higher CPDI and PHQ-9 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Being frontline personnel is associated with increased COVID-19-related stress. Depression is associated, however, with other groups not directly involved with the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Female gender and younger age correlated with COVID-19-related depression and stress.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services , Preventive Health Services/methods , Student Health Services/methods , Students/psychology , Teaching/psychology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Promotion/methods , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Health , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Student Health Services/organization & administration , Universities , Young Adult
15.
Interface (Botucatu, Online) ; 25(supl.1): e200589, 2021. ilus
Article in Spanish | WHO COVID, LILACS (Americas) | ID: covidwho-1332050

ABSTRACT

El artículo tiene como objetivo analizar los indicadores asociados al bienestar materno-infantil en los protocolos cubanos de actuación para la Covid-19. Con este fin, se realizó un análisis cualitativo de contenido que combinó una lógica deductiva derivada de la revisión bibliográfica de la literatura sobre bienestar materno-infantil y experiencia positiva del parto, y otra inductiva, con base en el procesamiento de la información empírica de los protocolos cubanos, según las recomendaciones de la OMS y la OPS. El análisis reveló que las guías enfatizan en la vida de la madre y el niño y priorizan la atención de las embarazadas como parte del acceso universal y gratuito a la salud; pero descuidan aspectos cualitativos del bienestar y la calidad del servicio, y con ello, los derechos de las gestantes y madres, y sus necesidades físicas, emocionales, psicológicas, sociales y espirituales. (AU)


O artigo tem como objetivo analisar os indicadores associados ao bem-estar materno-infantil nos protocolos de ação cubanos para o Covid-19. Por tanto, foi realizada uma análise de conteúdo qualitativa que combinou uma lógica dedutiva derivada da revisão bibliográfica da literatura sobre bem-estar materno-infantil e uma experiência positiva de parto, e uma indutiva, baseada no processamento de informações empíricas de protocolos cubanos, a luz das recomendações da OMS e da OPAS. A análise revelou que as orientações enfatizam a vida da mãe e do filho e priorizam o cuidado à gestante como parte do acesso universal e gratuito à saúde. Porém, negligenciam os aspectos qualitativos do bem-estar e da qualidade do serviço e, com isso, os direitos da gestante e da mãe, suas necessidades físicas, emocionais, psicológicas, sociais e espirituais. (AU)


The article aims to analyze indicators associated with maternal and child wellbeing in the Cuban Covid-19 action protocols. We carried out a qualitative content analysis that combined a deductive logic derived from a bibliographic review of the literature on maternal and child wellbeing and positive childbirth experiences, and an inductive logic based on the processing of empirical information from Cuban protocols, in light of the recommendations issued by WHO and PAHO. The analysis revealed that the instructions emphasize the mother's and child's life and prioritize care provided for pregnant women as part of free and universal access to health. However, they neglect the qualitative aspects of wellbeing and service quality and, with this, they also neglect the pregnant woman's and mother's rights, as well as their physical, emotional, psychological, social and spiritual needs. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Parturition/psychology , COVID-19 , Maternal Welfare , Patient Care Planning , Cuba
16.
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba ; 78(1): 17-24, 2021 03 23.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1207975

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The present work describes the clinical characteristics and interventions to minimize morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods: It is a prospective cohort investigation of patients who received a response from the Health Centers in the southeast region (RS) of the metropolitan area (AMBA) from April 8 to September 30, 2020. A Situation Room was used epidemiological with two monitoring and follow-up boards, one for bed management and the other for patient management. Results: During the analyzed period, 2,588 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis were admitted, 1,943 with suspected COVID-19 pathology, and 1,464 subjects with other pathologies. 55% of the patients were men and the mean age was 51 years. There were 82.8% patients with pre-existing diseases, hypertension and diabetes were the most frequent. 14% were hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. The mortality of the cohort was 15.05%, mortality was higher for men, with a mean age of 60 years, 92.65% had some pre-existing disease. Conclusion: Our cohort is younger than other published works. Older people, men, and people with comorbidities are at increased risk for COVID-19-related mortality. The public health system was able to respond to the demand without collapsing the hospital institutions.


Introducción: En el presente trabajo se describen las características clínicas y las intervenciones para minimizar la morbimortalidad en pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de COVID-19. Métodos: Es una investigación de cohorte prospectiva de pacientes que recibieron respuesta de los Centros de Salud en la región sudeste (RS) del área metropolitana (AMBA) desde el 8 de abril hasta el 30 de septiembre de 2020. Se utilizó una Sala de Situación epidemiológica con dos tableros de monitoreo y seguimiento, uno de gestión de camas y otro de gestión de pacientes. Resultados: Durante el periodo analizado se internaron2.588pacientes con diagnóstico COVID-19 confirmados, 1.943 con sospecha de patología COVID-19, y 1.464sujetos con otras patologías. El 55% de los pacientes eran hombres y la edad media fue de 51 años. Hubo 82,8% pacientes con enfermedades preexistentes, hipertensión y diabetes fueron las más frecuentes. El 14% fue hospitalizado en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva. La mortalidad de la cohorte fue del 15,05%, la mortalidad fue mayor para los hombres, con una edad media de 60 años, el 92,65% tenía alguna enfermedad preexistente. Conclusión: Nuestra cohorte es más joven que otros trabajos publicados. Las personas mayores, los hombres y las personas con comorbilidades tienen mayor riesgo de mortalidad relacionada con COVID-19. El sistema de salud público pudo responder a la demanda sin llegar a colapsar las instituciones hospitalarias.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Public Health , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Gac Sanit ; 36(1): 32-36, 2022.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1056624

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has hit Spain particularly hard, despite being a country with a developed economy and being praised for the robustness of its national health system. In order to understand what happened and to identify how to improve the response, we believe that an independent multi-disciplinary evaluation of the health, political and socio-economic spheres is essential. In this piece we propose objectives, principles, methodology and dimensions to be evaluated, as well as outlining the type of results and conclusions expected. Inspired by the requirements formulated by the WHO Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response and by experiences in other countries, we detail the multidimensional aspects to be evaluated. The goal is to understand key aspects in the studied areas and their scope for improvement in terms of preparedness, governance, regulatory framework, national health system structures (primary care, hospital, and public health), education sector, social protection schemes, minimization of economic impact, and labour framework and reforms for a more resilient society. We seek to ensure that this exercise serves not only at present, but also that in the future we are better prepared and more agile in terms of our ability to recover from any pandemic threats that may arise.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health , Public Policy , SARS-CoV-2
18.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 35(6): 339-347, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the first wave of the epidemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, hospitals have come under significant pressure. This scenario of uncertainty, low scientific evidence, and insufficient resources, has generated significant variability in practice between different health organisations. In this context, it is proposed to develop a standards-based model for the evaluation of the preparedness and response system against COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study, carried out at the University Hospital of Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona (Spain), was designed in two phases: 1) development of the standards-based model, by means of a narrative review of the literature, analysis of plans and protocols implemented in the hospital, a review process by expert professionals from the centre, and plan of action, and 2) validation of usability and usefulness of the model through self-assessment and hospital audit. RESULTS: The model contains 208 standards distributed into nine criteria: leadership and strategy; prevention and infection control; management of professionals and skills; public areas; healthcare areas; areas of support for diagnosis and treatment; logistics, technology and works; communication and patient care; and information and research systems. The evaluation achieved 85.2% compliance, with 42 areas for improvement and 96 good practices identified. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a standards-based model is a useful tool to identify areas for improvement and good practices in COVID-19 preparedness and response plans in a hospital. In the current context, it is recommended to repeat this methodology in other non-hospital and public health settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Plan Implementation , Management Audit , Models, Organizational , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communication , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delphi Technique , Health Plan Implementation/standards , Humans , Leadership , Public Health , Spain/epidemiology , Standard of Care , Tertiary Care Centers/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL